keywords

!Garib (2) Acacia karroo (1) afroedura (1) agriculture (1) algae (1) all that crawlith (2) amphibians (3) anthrax (1) aposmatic colouration (2) arachnid (4) arthropod (1) Baobab (3) bat (2) Bat Migration (1) biodiversity (15) bipedalism (1) birds (4) Black Mamba (2) Botswana (1) brumation (1) buffalo (1) Bush Meat (1) bushveld (4) Cambrian (1) Carbon Cycle (1) Central Africa (1) Chameleon (1) chemical erosion (1) coastal forest (1) cocoon (1) coevolution (2) colony (1) conservation (6) consume (1) cosmos (1) cultivation (1) darkling (1) death (3) decomposer (1) Desert (1) Devonian (1) diapsid (2) domestication (1) drought (1) Durban (2) Ecology (9) elapid (2) elephant (1) endemic (2) Energy Cycle (1) eugene marais (2) evolution (2) eye spots (1) fire (2) flash colouration (1) flat dog (1) flower (1) Forest (1) Forest Cobra (1) frog (3) fungus (1) gecko (3) Gondwana (1) Grass (3) herpetology (3) hibernation (1) human culture (8) hyrax (2) identification (3) imago (1) impact crater (1) Inanda (1) Inquiline (1) insect (5) Johannesburg (6) Kalahari (1) Kasanka (1) katydid (3) Klipriviersberg (2) koppies (1) Lajuma (1) larva (1) Leopard (1) Lepidoptera (1) Limpopo (3) Limpopo Valley (1) lowveld (2) Medike Mountain Sanctuary (3) meteorite (1) mimicry (5) mining (2) Miombo (1) mite (1) money (1) moult (1) naja annulifera (1) Namakwa (2) namaqualand (1) natural history (2) nature (7) Neolithic (1) neurotoxic (1) Nietzsche (1) nocturnal (2) Northern Cape (1) nutrient cycle (2) Owl (1) Pafuri (1) Paleoanthropology (1) parasite (2) parasitic (1) pathogenic (1) photosynthesis (1) pioneer (1) Poaching (1) poisoning (1) pollination (1) Predetor and Primate Project (1) raptor (1) reptile (5) reptiles (6) Richtersveld (1) rust (1) savanna (6) scorpion (4) Scorpions (1) selati river (1) skink (1) Snake (7) Snake Snake Snake (2) snouted cobra (1) solifuge (2) South Africa (1) southern africa (1) Soutpansberg (4) Soutpansberg Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation (3) spider (3) spoor (1) spore (1) stone age (1) stridulate (2) Suikerbosrand (1) summer (3) swarm (2) taxonomy (1) Urban Birds Johannesburg (3) Urban ecology (4) Urban Forest (2) Vachellia karroo (1) Vachellia robusta (1) Vachellia xanthophloea (1) Venda (1) venom (1) venus (1) Vhembe Biosphere Reserve (4) waterberg mountains (2) weathering (1) weeds (1) Welgevonden (1) wetland (2) Wheat (1) winter (2) Zambia (1) zoonotic (1)

Blog Archive

Showing posts with label nutrient cycle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nutrient cycle. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Grass: a quiet accomplice


Various species of grass growing together in a grassland area.
Grass has been around for 30 million years. There are 9 700 species of grass of which 967 occur in Southern Africa with 329 endemic species. [1] This makes grass the fourth largest plant family on earth. From a day-to-day perspective the importance of grass to humans is often underestimated. One needs only to think what they ate for breakfast this morning or dinner last night and you will realise that grass is an important part of every meal. Rice, oats, maize, wheat, barley, rye, sugar and more are all grasses and are an important cornerstone of daily diets. Even the animals that we eat are dependent on grass, therefore we are indirectly getting the energy they have converted from the grass. The role of grass in the energy cycle and nutrient cycle is extremely important.

Due to the low growth parts of the plant, grass is able to withstand fire, drought and grazing. Using these destructive forces to gain advantage over other plants growing around it.
Of the grasses the most important in terms of contemporary human culture is the grass we know as wheat. Wheat, a prime agitator of the Neolithic revolution, was first cultivated in the Fertile Crescent at least 10 500 years ago. This ultimately resulted in the success of humans over other species. Wheat enabled humans to spread out and sustainably increase their population densities into Europe and Asia and eventually the entire world. The domestication of grass also led to the domestication of livestock and this further contributed to the success of humans. [2]  
Grassland scene consisting of a few types of grass. There are grasses filling all the niches in the grassland ecosystem. Some are bushy, some grow low to the ground, while some form dense stands.
Today grass is widely cultivated due to human activity. Sugar, maize, rice and wheat are the most commonly cultivated grasses globally. The amount of land that is under the cultivation of these grasses is enormous. The environmental impact and socioeconomic implications of the widespread cultivation of grasses is significant and very interesting to think about. From an ecological perspective it is clear that globally biodiversity is negatively affected because of these crops.
These burnt out trees are testament to a past fire. These trees were over five years old. No longer saplings, yet they succumbed to the flames. 
From the perspective of the grasses however, their success is really astounding. They have, in a sense, managed to use humans to spread globally and colonize land that they would never naturally be able spread to. They managed this trick by offering a high-energy sugar in exchange for worldwide cultivation. The relationships of these grasses to humans can be seen as one of obligate mutualism. Humans would not be able to continue the way they currently live without these grasses and the grasses, such as wheat, rice, maize etc., as they currently exist would not be able to survive without people.

This Aloe will survive the fire damage, its point of growth is well protected by its fleshy leaves and compressed growth form. The Acacia saplings that grow around this aloe have burnt and most will not survive.
Despite getting some help from people, grasses have done very well for themselves. They have been around for about 30 million years. The origin of grass must have been humble: a small plant adapted for dry conditions competing with other desert scrub plants. Over time more species appeared and began to compete with and replace dry woodland areas. About four million years ago grass had begun to produce savanna. [3] Today approximately 40 percent of the earth’s terrestrial surface is covered by grass. The success of grass has to do with the co-evolution of grazing animals, the resistance to frost and the ability of grass to use fire to its advantage as well as the ability of grass to be drought resistant.

Even on rocky hills like this, over time grass will replace the woody plants.
The growing points of grass are low on the plant and these are often below the ground. With other plants, the growth points are above ground and susceptible to fire damage as well as frost damage. Over time fires and frost will eliminate the small trees and shrubs and favour the grasses as dominant on the landscape. Within any grassland system there will be many other plants that are not grasses that are adapted for the hostile conditions of growth created by the grassy cover.

Euphorbia clavarioides is a herbaceous plant adapted to grassland areas. 
Xerophyta retinervis, this is another plant adapted to grassy areas. The stem is fire resistant and can survive sustained drought and spells of frost.
The ability of grass seeds to lay dormant in or on the ground is the way in which grass overcomes the problem of drought. Most trees and shrubs are not drought resistant and over time the grassland will grow and these plants will be displaced. In well established grassland, trees and shrubs often only grow in protected areas and drainage lines.

Some trees are specifically adapted to grassland areas. This Cussonia paniculata has deeply fissured and corky bark. This offers it some resistance to fires and cold. The other trees in the photograph may have survived the fire, but they too will eventually be replaced by grass.

Africa, because of the large areas of grassland and associated savanna is home to 75 different bovids and of these 72 are antelope. This is an incredible diversity. These animals came into existence about 25 million years ago which is well within the era of grass. Even though not all antelope are grazers, they are just an example of the kind of diversity that a rich food source can sustain.   
The Blue Duiker, Cephalophus monticola, one of the smallest antelope. This is a forest species which browses on fallen fruit and leaves. Even though it is not a grazer this species indicates the diversity which has been enhanced by grass.
  
The Eland, Tragelaphus oryx, is the largest antelope. This animal which can way up to 940kg is a major consumer of grass. Even though they do browse, grass makes up a substantial portion of their diet.
On a global level, grass plays a very important role. There is a theory that the expansion of grassland globally has played a role in the cooling of the earth over the last 30 million years. The theory is summed up as follows by McCarthy and Rubidge (2005) in the following way:

Grasslands store far less carbon than forests in actual plant material, but grassland soils are usually far richer in carbon than forest soils, so grasses effectively remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it in soils. This may in part be due to frequent fires, which produce copious charcoal that is not easily decomposed by bacteria and becomes incorporated into the soil. […] Grasslands are much lighter in colour than woodland and they reflect a greater proportion of solar radiation into space, contributing to cooling. The air over grasslands is generally much drier than over woodland because trees tap deep-water sources and pump the water into the atmosphere by transpiration. Water vapour is a powerful greenhouse gas, so more grassland means drier, and thus cooler air. (The Story of Earth and Life. Struik: Cape Town. Page 261.)

This grassland scene captured in the Suikerbosrand Nature Reserve clearly shows how much lighter grassland is compared to woodland. Note how shrubs and trees are limited to protected areas.
The rise of grasslands led to a decline in forests and many animals had to adapt to this change. Grazers emerged and colonized the grasslands and carnivores followed. Human evolution was also significantly affected by the domination of grass plants. Paleoanthropology generally accepts that the ancestors of modern humans left the forests to become savanna creatures, and that this move from forests to the grassy plains was what resulted in bipedalism. [4]

Grass has been an important factor for the emergence of the human being. It played a role in the primordial past when hominids were still finding their legs and it played a major role in the development of modern culture through the early beginnings in the Neolithic period. It has also produced partner animals on which we are reliant and which have also helped humans rise to the point where we now find ourselves. On a global scale, grass may be responsible for cooling our planet and keeping the temperatures at an optimal level. Without grass, humans would not have developed, as the forests would not have receded forcing our distant ancestors to colonize the open areas.


Our culture and biology is so closely tied to grass that the global colonization of the human animal would not have been possible without the domestication of specific species of grass. One thing however is for certain, when humans are long gone, grass will continue to quietly grow and be a powerful source of energy driving biological diversity and sustaining a multitude of organisms.

This harvester termite, Hodotermes, is a major grazer of grassland. Insect consumption of grass is greater than that of mammalian  consumption in natural areas. These termites diets consist of 94% of grass and they can consume 1-3 metric tons of forage per hectare per year. 


[1] van Oudtshoorn, F. 2012.  Guide to Grasses of southern Africa. Briza: Pretoria. Page 10.

[2] For a more detailed and very stimulating discussion of the role of wheat in human culture see Jared Diamond’s book Guns, Germs and Steel.

[3] McCarthy, T and Rubidge, B. 2005. The Story of Earth and Life. Struik: Cape Town. Page 261.


[4] Anyone can try a simple experiment to see that advantages of bipedalism first hand. Next time you are in a grassland environment, when surrounded by long grass, go down on your hands and feet and see how different the environment is from down there. The adaption of standing on ones rear feet provides security as well as a vantage point from which one can see the surrounding environment, thus contributing to the success of the species.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Insects: a fascinating life form.


Caelifera Grasshopper that is exceptionally yellow. 
Insects make up about 90% of all known animals. One million species have been described and this number is estimated to be between 10 and 20 percent of the total amount of insect species in existence (there are still a lot to be discovered). A testament to the biological success of insects is the time they have been around. The first insects are thought to have emerged during the Devonian period about 420 million years ago.

Insects are great consumers of plant matter and play a far more important role as primary consumers than mammalian herbivores. That means that they introduce a large amount of carbohydrate energy into the nutrient cycle that they acquire from plants.

Insects are not only important consumers, they are also important decomposers and are responsible for breaking down large amounts of dead organic matter and returning those nutrients back into the nutrient cycle.

Crematogaster ants consuming the soft insides of Beetle.
Insects are food for many animals. The insect eating suborder of bats, Microchiroptera, has one of the highest species diversity amongst mammals. There are about 830 species of Microchiroptera worldwide. [1] This species diversity would not be possible without insects.

Birds migrate in order to take advantage of insect population explosions. The Amur Falcon can migrate over 14 000 kilometers from Russia and Northern China to take advantage of termite alates and grasshoppers in Southern Africa. [2] 

Spiders are great consumers of insects. Araneomorphae, which are spiders that build webs in which to catch their prey are the primary insect eaters. Studies have estimated that spiders can consume up to 200 kilograms of insects per hectare per year. [3]

Nephilia eating a Locust.
Besides just being food, insects also play a major role in pollination and many plants have evolved with a specific insect and each is reliant on the other for each other’s existence. The best example of this relationship is that of the fig wasp and it’s specific tree of the Ficus genus. In general, every species of fig tree has a unique species of wasp that pollinates the fruit and allows the fig to reproduce. This mutualism is a good example of coevolution.   

The lifecycles of insects is another fascinating aspect of insect biology. There are two basic types of insect lifecycles: the hemimetabolic (incomplete metamorphosis) and holometabolic (complete metamorphosis). Grasshoppers, dragonflies and termites are examples of the first; moths and butterflies are examples of the second. In insects with a holometabolic lifecycle, the larva can be viewed as the feeding stage and the ‘adult’ can be seen as the breeding stage. The term adult is in fact misleading: and the more specific term imago is preferable. [4]

Chrysomeloidea Leaf Beetles mating.
In the same vein as seeing the larva as the feeding stage, one can take the thought further and it doesn’t take much imagination to see the larva as the mouth and the ‘adult’ the reproductive system of the insect which is no longer a unitary organism; rather the species takes the place of an individual. This way of looking at insects makes them bigger than the traditional way of seeing the puny ant walking in the great wide world. It’s a complicated idea and not very well expressed, but something to think about.[5]

These Pyrgomorphidae Grasshoppers have just hatched. The nymphs instinctively congregate and cluster together. They will stick together throughout the nymph stage although groups will disperse from this black mass.
These facts may or may not be interesting to you, but what I find the most interesting about insects is their ways of living. Their insect drives to consume, congregate, swarm, stridulate, amongst other things, are the most intriguing for me. What force pulls cicadas out of the ground in numbers to climb up tree trunks and moult? What is the force that drives a katydid to perch on a plant stalk in the dark and stridulate incessantly? What is the allure of artificial light to nocturnal insects? 

Processionary Caterpillars, Thaumetopoeinae. These insects stick close together throughout the larval stage.
They then make a train of insects and move across the ground in search of other Processionary Caterpillars.
Other Processionary Caterpillars are located by the thread left by the last one in the line. The lines link up forming incredibly long lines of Caterpillars that eventually head up a tree to make their cocoons. 
Matabele Ants, Pachycondyla analis on their way out on a raid. These ants are destroyers of termite colonies. These ants stridulate when provoked.

Moribund Termite mound, the death of this colony could be attributed to Matebele Ants.
The easy answers to these questions of course are the usual deterministic answers: ‘the need to find a mate’ or ‘the need to feel secure in numbers’ or ‘the need to obtain food’.  These answers may be correct but they are looking at the surface reasons behind the behaviours. I find it far more stimulating to think about the mysterious drives hidden in the chemical make-up of these little animals. The answers to these can only be guessed at, as we will never know what it is that drives insects. This is largely because insect life is so alien to us. One just has to look at the physical appearance of insects that has come about due to their lifestyles to appreciate just how strange they appear to be.

Ants of the Polyrhachis schistacea species tending Membracid Tree Hoppers. The bugs secrete a goo that the ants relish. In this mutualistic relationship the ants gain food and the tree hoppers gain protection. The ants tend the tree hoppers in a way that is akin to agriculture.
But it is this unknown and unfamiliar aspect of insect life that drives my curiosity and interest in these small animals. The more I learn, the more I see and the more enjoyment I get out of observing these creatures.

Stone grasshopper Trachypetrella perfectly resembles the granite on which it lives.
This Stinkbug, Pseudatelus mimics fungus that grows in rotting wood.
Mimicry is another fascinating phenomenon that is prominent in insects. For me the most arresting thing about mimicry is the time it takes for natural selection to arrive at something so incredible and that is compounded by the abundance of mimicry in nature.

Katydid Zabalius aridus, resembles a leaf.
The same Katydid taking evasive action with an example of flash colouration

Net-winged beetle of the Lycus genus uses aposmatic colouration to deter predation. These warning colours suggest the beetle is poisonous or foul tasting.
Cabbage tree emperor moth caterpillars, Bunaea alcinoe, are big and conspicuous. This is another example of aposmatic colouration and the red on the face look like the development of eye spots.
This incredible animal is a Monkey moth caterpillar, Eupterotidae. They are slow moving and move over the ground. Is this a possible scat mimic?
Rhanidophora cinctigutta is a caterpillar with strange club shaped protuberances on it's body, these move in rapid and urgent gestures, the aposmatic colouration and the movement all suggest that this insect is a wasp mimic.


[1] http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/html/SSC-Microciropteranbats/Chapter%201.html

[2] http://www.africanraptors.org/amur-falcon-migration-route-finally-plotted/

[3] http://www.conservation.unibas.ch/team/nyffeler/pdf/nyffeler2000bas.pdf

[4] For a more detailed and interesting overview of the nature of language and interpretation of the insect lifecycle see the essay by Stephen Jay Gould, Glow, Big Glowworm. Gould. 1991. Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History. W.W Norton & Company: New York.


[5] The pioneer of this way of thinking was Eugene Marais and these ideas were expressed in his work Soul of the White Ant which was published in 1937. This is a now outdated, yet beautiful text on the lifecycle of termites.